Monday, 24 June 2013

Budget 2013-14: No will to tax the rich

Budget 2013-14: No will to tax the rich


By just tinkering with tax rates here and there and imposing or enhancing regressive taxes - fixing revenue collection target at Rs 2598 billion for fiscal year 2013-14 - the new government has confirmed that like its predecessors it has no political will to tax the rich and tap the real tax potential of Pakistan, which is not less than Rs 8 trillion. It is obvious from the bare reading of Finance Bill 2013 that Ishaq Dar paid no heed to proposals given by experts for broadening of tax base and taxing the rich according to their ability, he rather opted to continue with presumptive and minimum tax regimes. 

The Finance Minister, Ishaq Dar, following in the footsteps of his predecessors, has shown no intention to bridge the huge tax gap and punish tax evaders. On the contrary, he has relied more on imaginary figures to restrict fiscal deficit to 6.3 percent of GDP. The revised estimate of fiscal deficit for the current year is 8.8 percent - measures like reducing Prime Minister's House expenditure may have political appeal but substantial economic impact is not there. No solution is offered for the Pakistan's real malady that is open and blatant non-compliance of tax laws by the powerful segments of society and existence of a large untaxed economy. Since the rulers themselves are the principal beneficiaries, they are not ready to undertake any corrective action or implement an aggressive policy to streamline the entire tax system. 

Ishaq Dar, like his predecessors, has accepted what was suggested by the crafty tax bureaucrats sitting in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). The tax wizards in FBR have managed to hoodwink the new government as well by keeping the laws and procedures complex and cumbersome. It gives them unfettered and unbridled powers coupled with unchecked discretion. The businessmen were expecting the reduction in sales tax rate, which has been increased to further one percent. The burden will be shifted to the end consumers. It will make life miserable for millions, already living below the poverty line. This by no means a people-friendly or business-friendly step. 

Before coming to power, both Nawaz and Shahbaz were highly critical of the economic policies of Pakistan People's Party, especially for seeking external loans and foreign aids. Now Shahbaz has openly sought assistance of foreign agencies to help Pakistan in overcoming its power crisis. He has requested international monetary institutions and donor agencies to extend maximum co-operation to find a solution to energy crisis, population control and development of health and other sectors. Earlier he was constantly talking about self-respect and self-reliance! While presiding over a meeting of representatives and experts from the World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID) and other donor agencies at Punjab House, Islamabad on June 10, 2013, he begged before those whom he used to blame "for all our ills" in his election speeches. 

The budget instead of raising revenue to the extent of Rs 8 trillion by taxing the rich and mighty, is eyeing the $1.4 billion reimbursement from the United States under the Coalition Support Fund (CSF), over $1 billion in fees through the auction of 3G (third generation) technology and some other sectors. These are petty figures. We can easily raise tax revenues of over Rs 8 trillion, but there is no political will to do so. 

Ishaq Dar too, before the announcement of budget allowed FBR to extend yet another immunity promising that if any outstanding tax dues are paid by June 30, 2013 no penal action would be taken as well as no default surcharge would be demanded. It shows the same attitude and policy as was adopted by the previous regimes of PPPP and Pervez Musharraf. So, people ask what is the difference between Nawaz and Zardari? - both protect tax defaulters. Both Nawaz and Zardari have enormous assets abroad and they cannot even think of taking any action against tax evaders. It would mean taking action against themselves. In fact, in the coming days, Nawaz will announce further tax concessions for the rich allowing more concentration of wealth in few hands. In the past, flight of capital and fake remittances to whiten untaxed money have been his "great achievements" in the wake of passing the so-called Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992 that helped Hudabiya Paper Mills to launder funds and seek immunity from any kind of probe by FBR or even Federal Investigation Agency (FIA). National Accountability Bureau (NAB) could have taken action against the beneficiaries but it chose to ignore the issue completely. 

PROPOSED TAX MEASURES The claim is that focus of the budget 2013-14 is to improve tax-to-GDP ratio, which will ultimately be increased to 15 percent by 2018 [No detailed plan is given and it is nothing but rhetoric] The broad themes of government's taxation policy are (i) taxing those who are not paying any tax, (ii) enhancing efficiency of the tax machinery, (iii) removing anomalies and distortions in the tax system, (iv) simplifying the tax procedures, (v) broadening of the tax base, (vi) rationalisation of tax rates and exemptions, (vii) encouraging corporatization and documentation (viii) taxpayers facilitation and (ix) to eradicate maladministration and corruption in FBR [Again these are mere words not supported by any concrete steps announced in the budget] 

Finance Bill 2013 proposes a number of new taxes, increased sales tax, more withholding tax on many items and many changes in excise duties. The burden on the common people has been increased and rich and mighty have not been asked to declare all the total world assets and their sources. Illogical tax measures like increasing rate on cash withdrawals from banks have been announced. The billions are lying abroad and invested at home without taxation, but there is not a single measure taken to confiscate all such assets. On the contrary only cosmetic measures like exemption from import duty for 1200CC hybrid cars or withholding tax on wedding ceremonies held at commercial venues have been proposed. 

Making hollow promises to the people of "wonders" and "great achievements" for them are merely electoral compulsions of all political parties and Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PLM-N) is no exception. In practice, the leaders of these parties are owners of huge assets and politics is their necessity to protect and promote their financial interests. They own political parties like personal assets, investing heavily in elections and then ensuring that after coming into power they reap more financial benefits. Democracy is just a sham in the Pakistani milieu where every budget is meant for cementing the control and rule of ashrafiya - comprising indomitable militro-judicial-civil complex, industrialist-turned politicians, landed aristocracy and unscrupulous traders. 

Our economy is that of ashrafiya. It serves the interests of the privileged classes. The ruling classes, representing only 2 percent of entire population, own 95 percent of national resources. They exploit labour of landless tillers, poor urban workers and white-collared employees to amass more and more wealth. Additionally, they create artificial hike in prices of essential items to snatch back whatever little is earned or saved by the 98 percent ordinary people. 

DISTURBING FACTS 

-- Financing huge non-productive expenditures: debt servicing of Rs 1154 billion, grants and transfer plus government running expenses of Rs 540 billion, Rs 600 billion for subsidies on power and food, Rs 300-400 billion for loss-making PSEs and Rs 627 billion for defence. 

-- Monstrous fiscal deficit: Rs 1502 billion of the tax revenue is to go to the provinces. Centre will have only Rs 1918 billion to meet all expenses. It means a huge fiscal deficit leading to more borrowing and enhanced outlay for debt servicing - a vicious circle for which no remedy is suggested. Total debt has already crossed the figure of Rs 13.5 trillion and will soon be Rs 15 trillion. 

-- Fast-depleting foreign exchange reserves: Reserves at just $6 billion will certainly force the government to go to IMF soon as 40 percent of these reserves have been borrowed from commercial banks in the forward market. The Finance Bill 2013, presented by Ishaq Dar, confirms that the poor are condemned to pay exorbitant indirect taxes while unprecedented tax concessions exist for the ashrafiya. Not a single tax is levied on the rich and mighty to bridge the monstrous fiscal deficit. 

On the contrary, shameless borrowing from banks and elsewhere is to continue in order to push the nation in a darker 'debt prison'. There is no inclination whatsoever to make Pakistan a self-reliant economy. The budget 2013-14, like all earlier budgets, favours the rich and taxes the poor to the extent of extinction. 

The budget-making process has become an epitome of apathy of the elected towards the masses of this country, who vote them into power with the hope that they would do something for their socio-economic uplifting or at least provide them basic essential services - housing, transport, education and health - to say the least. People in Parliament are least bothered about the impact of regressive taxation on the poor of this Land of Pure. Time and again, it has been emphasised that democracy is not electioneering per se. Establishment of a responsible government caring for the needs of its people is a prerequisite for true democratic dispensation, which is only possible if the Parliament performs its Constitutional role, implements flawless process of accountability and ensures good governance. But in the last Assembly about 75 percent of its members were tax return defaulters! Now majority of them are back for another 5 years! What do you expect from tax delinquents? If the members of Parliaments have no respect for Rule of Law how can they contribute positively towards promoting tax compliance? 

In the coming days, the government of PML-N will get the Finance Bill 2013 passed without any resistance or debate. Sole stress on indirect taxation [even under the garb of income taxation through presumptive tax regime on a number of transactions] without evaluating its impact on the economy and life of the poor masses is totally missing. There is no concern for decreasing contribution of income tax [although major portion of it is now composed of indirect levies or expenditure taxes) as percentage of GDP which is continuously declining; it was merely 1.9 percent in 2010-11, 2.2 percent in 2009-10, 2.6 percent in 2008-09, 2.9 percent in 2007-08, 3.0 percent in 2006-07, 3.01 percent in 2005-2006, whereas in 2004-2005 it was 3.15 percent [YEAR BOOKS 2004-05 to 2010-11 of FBR and Economic Surveys]. 

Reliance on indirect taxes that constitute 75 percent of total collection proves beyond any doubt that the tax system is emphatically contributing to rising poverty as people who earn enormous income and possess immense wealth are not being subjected to income taxation in Pakistan. Thus the very purpose of redistribution of wealth as the main object of taxation is being defeated and nullified. It is pertinent to mention that in 2012, the government of Sweden collected taxes at 53 percent of GDP, almost twice as high as the total tax revenue of America and Japan, with both collecting around 25 percent of GDP. In the Euro area, tax revenue, on average, reaches 40 percent of GDP. In contrast we have collected taxes at 8.4 percent of GDP. 

In Pakistan, there is no political will to tax the privileged classes. Pakistan has been facing a variety of crises specifically in areas of: resources for its developmental policies, meeting trade deficits, fiscal deficits and balance of payments, in addition to numerous others. One of the factors responsible for the present situation is failure to enforce tax compliance that is responsible for promoting a huge informal economy. 

FBR is directly responsible for this phenomenon as its mafia-like operations have helped the people to avoid tax on incomes by paying it "due share". Through the infamous system of SROs [Statutory Regulator Orders], FBR's top officials provide "legal" ways and means to the mighty and influential sections of the society (ashrafiya) to amass huge wealth that is now threatening the State's very survival. It is worth mentioning that even before presenting the Finance Bill, 2013, FBR issued notification 494(I)/2013 on June 10, 2013 giving immunity. Last year 569(I)/2012 was issued on 26 May 2012 saying that government officials in Grade 20-22 will pay just 5 percent tax on monetized transport allowance. Bureaucracy bestowed on itself this benefit of reduced rate taxation, blatantly bypassing the Parliament. Ishaq Dar despite being aware of it has done nothing against it which confirms that politicians and bureaucrats work hand in hand to cause the exchequer stupendous loss of revenue through SROs. 

Reduction of duties for cartels possessing enormous money has been extended by using executive authority in the form of SROs. Pakistan is a unique country where the executive authority can conveniently undo laws made by the Parliament under so-called delegated powers which is gross violation of Article 162 of the Constitution of Pakistan, which reads as under: 

"162. Prior sanction of President required to Bills affecting taxation in which Provinces are interested: - No Bill or amendment which imposes or varies a tax or duty the whole or part of the net proceeds whereof is assigned to any Province, or which varies the meaning of the expression "agricultural income" as defined for the purposes of the enactments relating to income-tax, or which affects the principles on which under any of the foregoing provisions of this Chapter, moneys are or may be distributable to Provinces, shall be introduced or moved in the National Assembly except with the previous sanction of the President." 

Article 162 debars even the National Assembly to grant exemptions without the prior approval of the President but interestingly, this power has been delegated unconstitutionally to an executive authority by the Parliament. How can Parliament delegate a power which it cannot exercise itself without the prior sanction of the President? By delegating powers under tax codes, the Legislature has violated Article 162 of the Constitution. 

We have repeatedly pointed out this brazen violation of the Constitution requesting Supreme Court to take suo motu action under Article 189. It is sad to note that till today our pleadings have fallen on deaf ears. We were expecting that Bar Councils, taxpayers, tax advisers, civil society, and businessmen would raise their voices on this issue, but till today there is complete silence on their side. No wonder any dictator-military or civilian-can play havoc with the supreme law of the land as he knows that those who claim to be champions of rule of law keep mum whenever it suits them. We remain the lone fighters against this flagrant violation of constitution that has serious ramification for the federation as a whole. History will never forgive those who have deprived the smaller provinces from exercising their constitutional right of fair and equitable fiscal jurisdiction. 

The common man is subjected to exorbitant sales tax and federal excise duty of 16 percent (tax incidence is 35 percent on finished imported goods after applicable customs duty, sales tax, federal excise, mandatory value addition and income tax) on essential commodities [even salt sold under brand names is subjected to 16 percent sales tax] but the mighty sections of society such as generals, high-raking bureaucrats, judges getting plots from the state are not paying any wealth tax/income tax on their colossal assets/incomes. The same is the case with big industrialists and landed classes that get concessions and exemption through SROs. 

The existing tax system protects the interests of ashrafiya and exploitative elements that have monopoly over economic resources - those who own 95 percent of national resources are contributing less than 2 percent to the overall tax collection. This shows why there is no political will to tax the privileged classes. Unfair taxation and inequitable distribution of resources is the root cause of our multiple socio-economic ills. State policies induce massive tax evasion [section 111(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is a permanent tool for whitening of untaxed money]. 

Pakistan has about 120 million mobile users who pay both income tax and sales tax but even less than 1.5 million file income tax returns - if statements filed for presumptive taxes are excluded, the actual number is below 700,000. Majority of mobile users may not have taxable income (Rs 350,000, raised to 400,000 from tax year 2013) yet they are burdened with undue liability. On the contrary, many rich people just pay a fraction of income tax (withheld at source) on their actual taxable incomes without bothering to file their income tax returns - less than 250,000 non-salaried return filers admitted that their annual income was more than Rs one million! 

Pakistan can easily collect Rs 8 trillion to eliminate fiscal deficit. If we have 10 million individuals having annual taxable income of Rs 1.5 million (a very conservative estimate), total income tax collection from them at the prevalent tax rates comes to Rs 3750 billion. If we add income tax collected from corporate bodies, other non-individual taxpayers and individuals having income between Rs 400,000 to Rs 1,000,000, the gross figure would not be less than Rs 5000 billion. FBR collected only Rs 716 billion as income tax in the last fiscal year. Similarly, due to rampant corruption in sales tax, federal excise and custom duties, the total collection is not more than 30 percent of actual potential. In fiscal year 2011-12, FBR collected Rs 804.8 billion under the head sales tax, Rs 122.5 billion under federal excise duty and only Rs 216.9 billion under custom duties. The total indirect collection of just Rs 1148.2 billion is pathetically low. It should have been at least Rs 3500 billion. If prevalent tax gap of billions is bridged, the total revenue collection cannot be less than Rs 8500 billion without imposing any new taxes or raising existing tax rates, which have been suggested in the Finance Bill 2013. 

Ishaq Dar is a chartered accountant and understands figure work well but he has shown no interest in bridging the tax gap that can increase tax revenues to Rs 8500 billion (Rs 5000 billion direct taxes and Rs 3500 billion indirect taxes). He probably knows that we can do so and there would be enough money for meeting current expenditure and for development and public welfare outlays but ashrafiya not only wants complete control over resources, it is also not willing to pay due taxes. Nawaz et al are part of ashrafiya that is not ready to implement Article 3 of the Constitution that says: "The State shall ensure the elimination of all forms of exploitation and the gradual fulfilment of the fundamental principle, from each according to his ability, to each according to his work". This is the real dilemma of Pakistan. We will never be able to reap the fruits of democracy unless this Constitutional obligation is fulfilled by the rulers. A budget conforming to this principle alone would qualify to be called pro-people and meant for progress of Pakistan and well-being of its citizens.(The writers, tax lawyers and partners in HUZAIMA & IKRAM (Taxand Pakistan), are Adjunct Professors at Lahore University of Management Sciences) 

Sunday, 23 June 2013

Heavy reliance on sales and withholding tax



 "THE focus of the budget 2013-14 is to improve the tax-to-GDP ratio to finally reach the targeted 15 per cent by 2018," said Finance Minister Ishaq Dar while presenting budget proposals in his speech to the National Assembly on Wednesday. Mr. Dar spell out nine steps of his government's taxation policy — 
Taxing those who are not paying taxes, enhancing the tax machinery efficiency, removing anomalies, simplifying tax procedures, broadening the tax base, rationalizing tax rates and exemptions, encouraging corporations and documentation, facilitating taxpayers and eradicating malpractice and corruption from the tax administration. However, most of these measures are not reflected in the tax proposals announced by Mr Dar in the budget, and therefore, look like political rhetoric. No innovation is visible, and the same old measures have been used to pocket easy revenue to reach the revenue target. The focus of the new tax proposals is to raise indirect revenue, and provide incentives to industrialists. But it lacks any direction to lure fresh investment. The government has imposed Rs209 billion worth of new taxes to meet the revenue target of Rs2,475 billion for 2013-14 — an increase of over 23 per cent from Rs2,007 billion in the outgoing fiscal year. At the same time, the government expects that the economic growth and rise in inflation will add an additional Rs259 billion to the kitty. Meanwhile, the target for direct taxes has been projected at Rs975.7 billion, while that for indirect taxes has been set at Rs1.499 trillion. The government is expected to realize an additional amount of Rs63.5 bil-lion through sales tax, Rs18.5 through. Federal excise duty, Rs1 billion through customs duty and Rs35 billion through administrative
Measures like plugging loopholes in income tax and sales tax regimes. Most of the income tax revenue measures, worth Rs83 billion, are proposed in an effort to help the documentation of the economy. A relief of more than Rs3 billion in in-come tax has been given mostly to industrialists. Meanwhile, the one per cent increase in general sales tax from 16 to 17 per cent will alone contribute more than Rs40 billion in sales tax collection in 2013-14. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) chairman Ansar Javed said that the revenue measures would help the government achieve the tax revenue target for the next year. The proposed measures may help the FBR achieve the target, but most of them will also have an ad-verse impact on consumers, as these are inflationary. The increase in the tax rates can encourage corruption through fake and flying invoices, be-sides tax evasion, and may also induced to reduce consumption. These two factors might actually bring down revenues, instead of raising them. And higher tax rates may also discourage the documentation of economy. The taxation measures will in-crease the burden for some existing taxpaying sectors, while easing it for others. Exemptions have been given on those products or accessories, or industries winch are not willing to compete, and prosper behind high tariff walls. There is also no vision in the tax policy to lure fresh investment, except the enhancement of the tax holiday from five to 10 years in special economic zones.. Meanwhile, the duty exemption on hybrid cars is likely to benefit the elite, and has nothing to do with promotion of industrialization. It will be difficult to argue that the tax measures in the budget may pro-mote economic growth. There are sectors where monopolies are impeding economic growth, and thriving on domestic sales. Meanwhile, major tax exemptions stood at Rs239.5bn in 2012-13, 16.3 per cent higher than Rs205.9 billion in 2011-12. And the new finance minister has extended these exemptions for certain lobbies and industries. In 2012-13, income tax exemptions had cost the exchequer Rs82.39 billion, against Rs69.61 billion in 2011- 12, indicating an increase of 18.37 per cent. And this number will in-crease further following the exemptions given in the new budget. Customs exemptions had hit government revenues by Rs119.71 billion in 2012-13. A range of exemptions given in the new budget will increase the figure to roughly Rs150 billion in the next year. These additional exemptions will benefit lobbies that allegedly sup-ported the PML-N in the May 11 elections. Moreover, some major sectors like agriculture and services continue to be under-taxed, while still others are not taxed at all reflecting the
narrow tax base. For instance, agriculture contributes hardly Rs 1 billion to the total: tax receipt, while its share in the national income stands at 21.4 per cent. Similarly, the services sector contributes 36.7 per cent while it has a major share of 57.7 per cent in the GDP. There is a broad consensus that the tax-to-GDP ratio can only be enhanced if all sectors of the economy proportionately contribute into tax revenue. But nothing has been done to correct these imbalances. For broadening the tax net, the old practice of relying heavily on withholding agents has again been proposed.. More than seven new adjustable withholding taxes have been introduced, with the government claiming that these will pro-mote documentation of the economy. But this will simply increase the cost of doing business for firms and would be borne by the end consumer These and other measures, like increasing the tax on cash withdrawals from banks, will not increase the tax base and only act as easy revenue getter for the government. NADRA data shows that there are over 3.8 million potential taxpayers. One must then ask what is it that stops the FBR from bringing these people into the tax net, given that only 0.8 million people filed tax re-turns in 2012. In short, there is no innovation in the tax proposals presented by the new government, which seem to evolve around the age-old practice of withholding and sales taxes. No announcements have been made regarding audit of taxpayers or use of NADRA data to help bring non-tax-payers into the tax net.
By Mubarak Zeb Khan

Friday, 21 June 2013

Twelve Simple Guidelines for Entry Test Preparation

Twelve Simple Guidelines for Entry Test Preparation


ETEA entry test is getting nearer and nearer and i can feel a rising tension among the second year students. Most of the F.Sc. students consider this test as something too difficult to get good marks in. Believe me it’s not; in fact it’s easier than the F.Sc. exam, Why? because you don’t have to worry about English, urdu, pak-studies, islamiat, No essays, no Long or short answer questions, no poems, nothing of that sort, only a few simple MCQ’s, a matter of three hours and that’s it.So the first and the foremost thing you should do is to get rid of this fear of entry test.
In this article I have tried to answer few of the most frequently asked questions about the entry test, and in doing so, I have attempted to provide you with some guidelines which In sha Allah will prove useful during your preparation.
1)When Should You Start Studying Specifically For The Test?
Right after your F.Sc. exam (even before your practical).
-If your preparation for the annual exam is good enough you can study a few of the first year chapters from entry test point of view even during second year prep.( I did Waves, physical optics, Chemical equilibrium during my prep, which proved useful for the Aga Khan test) But your first priority during your F.Sc. prep should be your FSc exam. (Don’t forget F.Sc. accounts for 40% of the aggregate)

2)The Books You Should Use:
-Your maximum focus should be on your own text books ( the KPK textbooks).
-For practicing MCQ’s ,the books i’d recommend are:
1-ETEA*
2-Pretest*
3-ICA Book
-Don’t even open MCAT, ECAT, SAT and other books, they might be essential for other tests but not for the ETEA entry test.
*these two books are based on old course so it’s ok if you find yourself unable to solve few of their MCQ’s
3)Your Method Of Study:
-The general method is simple:
  1. Read a chapter thoroughly from your text book (every word of it).
  2. Solve the MCQ’s given in it’s exercise.
  3. Solve the MCQ’s from the above mentioned books.
Some specific points:
1.Physics:
  • Do learn all the formulas by heart.(the only way to remember the formulas for a long term is to learn their derivations)
  • You must know the relation between different physical quantities. e.g. according to
K.E=1/2 mv^2
K.E. is proportional to the second power of velocity, so you must know what will be the affect of changing velocity on K.E( if you change the velocity twice,, how many times will K.E. change?)
  • in the end of every chapter there are some short questions given, some of them are a bit conceptual, you should at least know their answers.
2.Biology:
  • observe diagrams carefully, read the descriprtions given below the diagrams.
  •  No need to learn the names of the scientist or dates of discoveries, except the few famous ones.( even if you do try to learn them, they are so many that you will forget them in the end, so no use)
3.English:
  • You must know, on your finger tips, the rules of changing active into passive and passive into active voices.
  • The same goes for direct indirect speeches.
  • You should be aware of the simple grammar rules.
  • As far as vocabulary is concerned, only learn the meanings of those words which in the previous entry tests or which you did in your coaching classes. There are unlimited no. of words and maximum 2-3 words come in the test, so there is no logic in learning hundreds of words for 2-3 MCQ’s

4)Best Time Tto Study:
                       In the morning, Between Fajr and Zohar prayers. ( don’t waste that time sleeping).You can relax after that.

5)What About Federal Books?
You can use them for your F.Sc. exam but there is no need to use them for the entry test. ( apart from a few chapters in Chemistry like chemical equilibrium, aldehydes and ketones etc.)

6)What About A-Level Books?
You can use them to clear your concepts (especially in physics), but no MCQ directly comes from them.

7)What About Joining A Coaching Academy?
Before i answer this question, let’s have a look at this small survey, in which 58 of my class fellows participated:
Total students=58
those who joined academy=65%, (19% considered their decision of joining the academy wrong)
Those who joined ICA=25%
Those who joined FCA=6%
Those who joined Alhamra=5%
those who didn’t join any academy=35%(1% considered this decision of not joining the academy, wrong)
I joined ICA, but left it after the first year course was done.
-If you are a studious student and had worked hard enough during your F.Sc. you don’t need to join an academy.
-If you are weak in one particular subject, only do tuition for that subject.
-If you are not a very hard working, then i think you should join an academy.

8)The Most Important Question:How Many MCQ’s Should You Attempt?
In order to give you a more accurate answer, I conducted another small survey on my class fellows, in which 100 students took part. Following is the result of that survey:
Total students=100
13% attempted 190-200 MCQ’s, out of which:
10% scored=690+
38% =600-689
23% =550-599
23% =500-549*
29% attempted 180-189 MCQ’s, out of which:
0% scored=690+
7% =650-689
38% =600-649
48% =550-599
6% =500-549*
25% attempted 170-179 MCQ’s, out of which:
0% scored=690+
16% =650-689
24% =600-649
44% =550-599
12% =500-549*
19% attempted 160-169 MCQ’s,out of which:
0% scored =650+
5% =600-650
68% =550-599
26% =500-549*
10% attempted 150-159 MCQs,out of which:
10% scored =600+
30% =550-599
50% =500-549*
10% =450-500*
5 students attempted 140-149 MCQ’s, and their marks are 516*,528*,509*,550,474*.
So you can see from the above data, that if you want to score high in the test (i-e 550+), you should atleast attempt 170 mcq’s.(165-170)
Don’t leave an mcq if you have doubt in it, apply this rule;if you are confused between two options, and are sure that the other two options are wrong, then do attempt the mcq.( there is 50% chance that you will get it right), But if you don’t have any idea about any option, then you can leave it.(there is 75% chance that you will get it wrong in this case)
(I’d like to thank all my classfellows who helped me in this and the previous survey)

9)How To Attempt The Test:
Don’t attempt all the mcq’s in one go. Solve the simple ,direct MCQ’s( like those of bio and english) in the first go. In the second go, solve those Mcq’s which require a bit of reasoning. Leave the most difficult mcq’s for the last go. If you get stuck in an mcq, leave it and come to it in the end.
About filling the blocks:
a- Either fill them at the same time as you solve the mcq’s
b- or solve the mcq’s given on one side of a page ( there are usually 10-12 mcq’s on one side) and then fill their blocks.
NEVER LEAVE BLOCK FILLING TILL THE END.

10)What About Taking MM Tests?
I think it’s a good idea. Do take the tests, but not all of them, just 2 or max. 3. Don’t wait till they announce the answers, that take hours.(Keep in mind that their checking is not at all accurate)

11)What Should You Do If You Are An A-Level Student?
Since i didn’t do A-Levels myself, so i asked my classfellows who had done A-Levels, and this is what they said:
a-Start studying for the entry test during your A2.(esp. on Saturdays and Sundays)
b-If you can find a good F.Sc. teacher, do tuition with him.Or you can ask an elder bro/sis/friend who has done F.Sc. to help you with the F.Sc. course.
c-Most of them recommended joining a coaching academy for the entry test.
d-The subject that greatly differs from your A-Level course is biology (esp. first year). Better focus on it more.
( special thanks to Hoorish Malik, Maleeha, Anum Arshad, Ahmad Zuhayr, Asfandyar Ibrar,Areeb Iqbal and Haider Ayub, for providing me with these guidelines).

12)Seek Allah’s Help:
Always remember that ultimately everything is in Allah’s hand, if He doesn’t will, you can never succeed, so seek His help and guidance, and never skip salaah just because you are too busy studying.

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

How to Fit in to a New Workplace

How to Fit in to a New Workplace



·    Main points

            Be punctual
·         Establish goals
·         Be a perky person
·         Ask freely
·         Be organized
·         Be proactive
·         Build contacts
·         Communicate with the Boss
·         Don’t underestimate yourself